Loading…
This event has ended. View the official site or create your own event → Check it out
This event has ended. Create your own
Conversation, Community, & Connections at the intersection of Science & the Web
View analytic
Thursday, January 31 • 12:00pm - 1:00pm
Open access or vanity press?

Sign up or log in to save this to your schedule and see who's attending!

New online only, open access journals are being created at a rapid pace. Many of them charge high publication fees for papers, which is a departure from much of traditional scientific publishing. The fees and lack of a tangible physical product makes these journals look like "pay to publish" vanity presses. And many open access journals are just scams, as shown by the recent “Predatory publishers are corrupting open access” editorial in Nature. Even some of these journals have genuine scientists who are trying to publish good science, apparently unaware of other suspicious practices by the publisher. How can researchers, particularly early career scientists, determine if a new journal is a “real” journal?

Questions:
• How do traditional scientific journals differ from newer open access journals?
• How can a researcher tell the difference between a take the money and run publisher and a genuine journal?
• How can new open access journals shake off the perception that they are just scamming scientists for the money?
• What standards should be used to judge new journals as real scientific platforms?

Moderators
CG

Chris Gunter

Girlscientist Consulting (and a few other places)
Geneticist, recovering Nature editor, buddhist, and single mom in Atlanta.

Thursday January 31, 2013 12:00pm - 1:00pm
Room 7b

Attendees (24)